่ถ FIRST IMPRESSIONS
่ถ REVIEW OF BOOKS & FILMS
[REVIEW] “Inheritance and Reinvention in Kit Fanโs Goodbye Chinatown” by Jennifer Eagleton
Click HERE to read all entries in Cha
on Goodbye Chinatown.
Kit Fan, Goodbye Chinatown, World Editions, 2026. 268 pgs.

The main protagonist of Kit Fan’s second novel Goodbye Chinatown is totally focused on what she has always done best, โfinding her voice on a twelve-inch dinner plateโ, as she confronts a personal cultural struggle between tradition and change as an ethnic Chinese, a Hongkonger living in the United Kingdom in the 2000s, expressed through food.
Amber Fan, a young Oxford-educated chef, opens the first Chinese-fusion eatery in Londonโs Chinatown following the failure of her fatherโs traditional restaurant, The Golden Palace. Her parents decide to return to Hong Kong, while Amber remains in London alone. A wealthy and politically connected Mainland Chinese woman called Celeste becomes interested in the business, later advising Amber and bankrolling it over the years.
The first section of the novel, โLuna 2001โ, addresses Amberโs ambition to push culinary boundaries in order to develop a distinctive Chinese-fusion cuisine in her restaurant, Luna. As Amber says, โIf her food were an accent, RP would be the last thing she was aiming for.โ Her flavours โhad to be unfenced, borderless. Eating was travelling, she thoughtโ, yet when one looks at her menus, the Chinese elements are often difficult to identify in the elaborate names of the dishes. Despite the accolades of food critics, โThe more deeply she mastered the art of cooking, the freer and the more estranged she felt.โ Perhaps this is โwhy Amberโs food tasted so good, the way she converted absence into something strange and wholesomeโ, as Amberโs emotions become embedded in her dishes. When the financial crisis unfolds in 2008, Chinatown enters a period of decline and Luna approaches collapse. In her distress, Amber begins to push flavours to the edge of nonsense, with every dish becoming โan act of self-harmโ.
Celeste convinces Amber that she should open a restaurant in Shanghai as a place of the future. The restaurant, โShangri-laโ, also offers innovative food and also earns Michelin stars, and despite her initial reluctance Amber begins partially to agree with Celeste about the potential of working on the mainland. This section, entitled โShanghai 2007-2008โ, is not as fully developed as the โLuna 2001โ section and consequently feels rushed. Although her business in Shanghai appears to be flourishing, Amber remains conflicted about her identity and about the dynamics of her family as she moves repeatedly between China, the United Kingdom, and Hong Kong.
This is a period marked by intergenerational challenges. The novel reveals the differences between Amber, who was largely raised in London, and her parents, particularly her father, who represents continuity, and her mother, who acknowledges the present. It also maps the silences and secrets that often exist between parents and children who have lived through vastly different political and social realities. There appears to be a new genre of Hong Kong fiction that addresses these realities, with politics either in the background or placed in the foreground, as in the recent Everyday Movement by Gigi L. Leung.
The third section of the novel, โHong Kong University of the Chinese 3 June to 2 July 2019โ, feels rushed and less successful than the first half of the book, where the focus rests largely on Amber, her parents, and her son. In the earlier chapters, the political situation in Hong Kong remains largely in the background, whereas in this section politics is foregrounded, and the restaurant business is rarely mentioned. Instead, Amberโs son assumes a more prominent role, having previously appeared mainly as a minor character. The fourth section, โPo Fook Hill 2019โ, is also set in Hong Kong and centres on Amber, her mother, and Amberโs son, Bobby, addressing questions about how to confront the future in a time of uncertainty.
The final section, โThree Lives January 2020โ, again focuses on the relationships among members of the family, the changes taking place in Hong Kong, and Amberโs future restaurant plans. Amber has thrown herself into her career in order to escape the upheavals of family separations and reunions. By the end of the novel, however, she simplifies her cooking, abandoning the pursuit of Michelin stars and elaborate ingredients in favour of more homely fare, while her mother decides to remain in Hong Kong and face the changes that have taken place since 2020. Amber โhad tired of walking on a tightrope years agoโ of pushing culinary boundaries and โwanted to feel her feet on solid ground againโ. In other words, she no longer wishes to be โinnovativeโ merely for validation in the present, nor to treat tradition as something fixed in the past simply because it is considered โauthenticโ.
Too often so-called โChinatownsโ are declining spaces, functioning largely as tourist food courts. โThere is permanence in transience,โ Celeste says, โand nothing sells like transience.โ Yet one may question whether this is truly the case. Amberโs father is portrayed as a conformist to tradition: โEvery business decision he made about The Golden Palace was to suit what people think Chinatown should look like, should taste like, the red lanterns, the Peking ducks, the fortune cookies.โ This novel offers a refreshing perspective on the complexities of the Hong Kong diaspora in England in the 2000s, situated between the desire to preserve continuity during a period of profound change โback homeโ and the transformation of a London Chinatown.
As readers, we are left with the sense that it may be possible to accept change while preserving cultural tradition, and at the same time to continue defending the values that matter to an ethnic diaspora. In other words, the novel gestures toward a form of compromise.
How to cite, Eagleton, Jennifer. “Inheritance and Reinvention in Kit Fanโs Goodbye Chinatown.” Cha: An Asian Literary Journal, 16 Mar. 2026. chajournal.com/2026/03/16/kit-fan-chinatown.



Jennifer Eagleton, a Hong Kong resident since October 1997, is a close observer of Hong Kong society and politics. Jennifer has written for Hong Kong Free Press, Mekong Review, and Education about Asia. She has published two books on Hong Kong political discourse: Discursive Change in Hong Kong(Rowman & Littlefield, 2022) and Hong Kongโs Second Return to China, A Critical Discourse Study of the National Security Law and its Aftermath(Palgrave Macmillan, 2025). Her poetry has appeared in Voice & Verse Poetry Magazine, People, Pandemic & ####### (Verve Poetry Press, 2020), and Making Space: A Collection of Writing and Art (Cart Noodles Press, 2023). [All contributions by Jennifer Eagleton.]

